ESUs position on the European Universities Initiative
The European Universities Initiative represents a significant step towards fostering deeper collaboration across higher education institutions (HEIs) in Europe. This initiative not only aims to enhance the quality of education but also to build stronger ties across borders, fostering inclusivity and interoperability. The European Students’ Union (ESU) welcomes these efforts, recognizing the value they bring to student mobility, diversity, and internationalisation. However, they also require further improvement to ensure that they are truly democratic, inclusive, and sustainable.
(Possible) Positive Outcomes
- Diverse Range of Focus Areas Across Alliances
- Enhanced Internationalisation and Implementation of Bologna tools
- Work on Interoperability
Due to the broad experimental approach, where alliances have been able to tailor their focus based on institutional and regional priorities, a diverse landscape of alliances has emerged, allowing for creative solutions and innovations for a multitude of different approaches. This diversity fosters creative solutions and innovations, enriching the educational ecosystem by accommodating multiple approaches. However, this potential needs to be carefully examined. A critical question arises: are all academic disciplines equally represented in the activities of the alliances? Without proper balance, there is a risk that certain fields may be overrepresented while others are neglected.
Increased international collaboration between HEIs has the potential to strengthen the implementation of Bologna tools, advancing the goals of the European Higher Education Area. Alliances can facilitate improved credit mobility by addressing issues such as automatic recognition and better alignment in the use of ECTS — current key barriers for students considering mobility programs like Erasmus+. However, these improvements require greater trust, transparency and a deeper understanding between the institutions which is achievable with joint efforts for implementation of Bologna tools and commitments. Unfortunately, there are currently no targeted initiatives that fully exploit the potential of alliances to enhance credit mobility, and the push for increased mobility targets may have unintended negative consequences due to shifting definitions of mobility.
Lastly, the efforts to enhance interoperability between HEIs, which aim to streamline the integration of systems, curricula, and administrative processes, are commendable. However, the focus on alliances should be critically evaluated. In the long term, interoperability must extend to all 5,000 HEIs in Europe, not just those within alliances. Otherwise, there is a risk of creating a two-tiered system, where non-alliance institutions are left behind in terms of development and integration. Therefore, inclusive strategies are essential to prevent a fragmented higher education landscape in Europe.
Areas for Improvement
- Lack of Democratic and Representative Student Participation
- Lack of an Inclusivity Framework
- Funding Structures and Project Mentality
- Limited Awareness and Reach
One of the most significant shortcomings of the alliances is the absence of democratic and representative structures for student participation. This directly contradicts the fundamental values underpinning the EHEA and the democratic and representative principles championed by the EU at large, undermining higher education democratic governance and ultimately endangering academic freedom. To ensure genuine democratic involvement, it is crucial that student representatives, who are already elected at HEI levels through the local student population, are integrated into the governance structures of the alliances. Furthermore, there is a need for training programs for student representatives to prepare them for the complexity of their roles within the alliances. Without adequate support, training and funding for their activities and training, students may struggle to effectively contribute to decision-making.
Secondly, the lack of a robust inclusivity framework that guarantees equal access for all students hinders students from underrepresented, disadvantaged and vulnerable backgrounds to partake in the initiatives of the alliances. For the alliances to fulfil their promise of inclusivity, more concrete measures are required to ensure that all students, regardless of their socioeconomic background or field of study, can fully participate in and benefit from alliance activities. There is also a need to ensure that alliances do not cater to only a select group of students or study fields, but are made accessible and relevant across the entire student body of member institutions.
As of now, the funding of alliances is heavily project-based, creating a short-term mindset that prioritises immediate deliverables over long-term sustainability. This has led to a “project mentality” where initiatives are driven by the need to meet funding requirements based on work packages designed to cater evaluators demands for project calls rather than addressing the core needs of the students and institutions to develop the alliances in accordance with actual needs and visions of the partaking academic community. Furthermore, disparities in national funding contributions create inequities between alliances, with institutions in wealthier member states receiving more resources than those in less well-funded countries. A more equitable funding structure, possibly through centralised European funding distribution, is necessary to ensure that all alliances have the same opportunities for success.
Lastly, despite their potential, the alliances remain relatively unknown to the wider student population and staff. Awareness about the opportunities and benefits they offer is low among students and staff. More concerted efforts are needed to promote the alliances and their activities, ensuring that they are accessible to a broader audience. Additionally, it is important to reflect on whether all study fields within member institutions are equally involved in alliance activities, or if certain fields are being left out of these collaborative efforts.
Concluding, the European Universities Initiative presents a promising framework for transforming European higher education by promoting diversity, internationalisation, and cooperation. However, significant improvements are needed in terms of student participation, inclusivity, funding structures, and awareness. Ultimately, ESU believes that the alliances should remain a tool for further implementation of the Bologna tools and thus be closely linked to the commitments and functioning of the EHEA.
Further reads: